College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

MAKING CENTS: Ball State sports cost $827 per student for 2008-09

By Derek Wilson

Print this article

Published: Thursday, November 5, 2009

Updated: Thursday, November 5, 2009

derek_wilson

Derek Wilson is a senior economics and finance double major and writes 'Making Cents' for the Daily News. His views do not necessarily agree with those of the news paper.

How many Ball State University football games have you been to this year? All of them? A few? At least one? How many did you pay for? None, right?

Students get in to all Ball State sporting events for free. We all may think this is an advantage of being a student and quietly laugh as we see non-students actually paying to get in. But we are not getting in for free. In fact, we are all paying a very high price for Ball State’s beloved sports. Not only do we have to pay for our own tickets, we help make the tickets for the general public cheaper. We are subsidizing the community’s enjoyment of Ball State sports.

How much does each student actually pay for sports? The actual numbers are found buried in the annual budget. Using the numbers from the 2008-09 budget, there is a $1,464 dedicated fee charged to each full-time student. The dedicated fee is included in tuition and fees and is generally used for funding student services, technology, etc. Of this dedicated fee, 56 percent is used to fund intercollegiate athletics. This works out to $827 per student. The proposed budget for 2009-10 increases the amount allocated to sports to $877 per full-time student.

Interestingly enough, it costs only $216 for season tickets to all Ball State sporting events. That is admission to all events Ball State charges for: football, men and women’s basketball, and women’s volleyball. As far as marginal benefits, the season pass available to anyone is equivalent to the “free” admission available to students.

In reality, the vast majority of students do not attend sporting events and even though they do not attend, they are still being charged. I attend one, maybe two, football games a year. I would be much better off buying the tickets for $20, or whatever price on game day, and not having to pay $877. I would save $837. Ball State is making me $837 worse off. Why are we all being charged for something only a few of us use?

Ball State’s intercollegiate sports department would operate in the red if not for the student subsidy. For 2008-09, the athletics department budgeted expenses were $14.3 million, two of the main revenue sources to cover these expenses were almost $8.9 million from student fees and $2.5 million from additional university support. Ticket sales were only expected to be less than one million. Intercollegiate sports, at least at Ball State, are not self-sustaining.

Maybe Ball State’s athletics spending is in line with other universities. A recent article from Newsday.com, titled “Survey says college sports financially unsustainable,” showed the results of a survey of university presidents about college athletics spending. The results showed that 80 percent of Division I schools’ athletics programs have been losing more than $10 million a year.

The majority of presidents also agreed that coaching salaries are excessive, and there needs to be greater transparency when it comes to athletics. Ball State’s football coach earns the second most at the university: $350,000, only $6,400 less than President Jo Ann Gora.

Currently on our tuition bill, we see some of the “dedicated fee” broken up. There are technology fees, health center fees and other student service fees. However, intercollegiate athletics, which is 56 percent of the dedicated fee, does not show up. Why is such a large percentage of the dedicated fee not itemized? Either Ball State does not think it is important for students to know they are spending $877 each year on sports, or they do not want us to know.

Greater scrutiny is finally being placed on out of control athletic spending. In the past year, due to the budget problems of almost all universities across the country, administrators were faced with how to allocate limited amounts of funds. Ultimately, spending increased on athletics, and cuts were made on the academic end (this includes Ball State).

According to a recent article in USA Today, faculty at the University of California Berkley have had enough. They were alarmed to find that student fees funded 11 percent of athletic expenses. They currently have a motion in their University Senate to require their athletic programs to balance their budgets, slow the spending increases and eventually end academic subsidizes to college sports.

Ball State students fund almost 62 percent of the athletic budget and ticket sales account for less than 7 percent of revenue. It seems to me that if the faculty of Berkley were angry about their athletics budget problems, the Ball State faculty should be outraged, as should students who are footing the bill. At the very least, the dedicated fee every student pays should be itemized to include “intercollegiate sports subsidy.”

Comments

11 comments
B.Brown
Sun Nov 8 2009 23:37
Well, not much to be done......of course I would rather my money go towards books for our library!
Adam
Sat Nov 7 2009 20:01
Ball State sports, football in particular, is the MOST important aspect of Ball State. I graduated from the Tcom department last year, and the largest reason i got an out of state job making a very good annual salary is because my boss was a huge Ball State fan. SPEND SPEND SPEND. Do whatever it takes to get Ball States name out to the rest of the country! It pays HUGE dividends....trust me
Fed Up
Sat Nov 7 2009 11:53
College sports is just another kind of organized crime. It's a big extortion racket and the coaches and administrators are criminals.
Academics not Sports
Sat Nov 7 2009 07:51
Athletic events are so costly and primarily a waste of money. I would much rather see people pay for the events and have the athletes pay for going to school.

It is not fair for a big doofy football player to go to school for free when he is robbing a potentially viable scholar of at least a portion of a ride. The football players seldom continue to be a factor to help change the world. NOT saying that is always the case, but look at the percentages and it's hard to argue!

Drop the sports or let those who participate PAY!!!

High Lotto Nuts
Fri Nov 6 2009 17:38
and yet, Ball State continues to be on the bottom end of athletic budgets within the MAC. We spend less than almost every other school of our size.
eflow
Fri Nov 6 2009 09:58
Subsidizing is not limited to just athletics… There are numerous activities/services that are "subsidized" for BSU students..... think of the reduced costs for events (concerts, speakers, etc.).... free printing on university printers...what about the library? how many times do you pay to enter the library and use their services? never?!? what about medical services? some students never get sick, and never use the services that are provided at a reduced cost. counseling? tutoring? resume preparation? placement services? clubs/organizations that receive funding from the school? the list goes on & on...sure you may use some of them, but no one uses all of them..but they pay for them…indirectly….

step back and think of living in a community. your taxes are allocated to pay for a variety of services, many of which (if you are fortunate) you never have to use (fire, ambulance, etc.). think of the people who live in a community with no kids... their taxes go towards elementary, middle and high schools....how many people do not use their local libraries? think of the younger generation paying for services for the elderly...and the examples go on & on.

the solution? take advantage of the "free" services....and if you don’t use them, oh well…. Your loss.

your entire life you will be subsidizing programs and services that you never use, or in some cases never even heard of...

An Incoming Freshmen
Thu Nov 5 2009 18:38
This really doesn't change my decision to come to the school, but it does kinda bite. I kinda agree with Michelle and I kinda agree Derek. It's a two-edged sword
Not a sports fan
Thu Nov 5 2009 17:10
@Michelle

That's your opinion. I for one would be fine with attending a University without sports.

Michelle
Thu Nov 5 2009 15:19
I will gladly pay it. Who wants to attend a University with no athletics?
Maybe students should start supporting their Cardinals and getting their money's worth.
If you don't attend the wide variety of sporting events (as well as other "free" events provided on campus) you are missing out on part of your college experience.
Student
Thu Nov 5 2009 12:21
I think he means that the majority of faculty at BSU did not receive salary raises, yet athletics spending increased and coaches received significant raises
Corporal Punishment
Thu Nov 5 2009 10:47
Glad to see some investigative reporting by a DN journalist. I gotta ask about this line:

"Greater scrutiny is finally being placed on out of control athletic spending. In the past year, due to the budget problems of almost all universities across the country, administrators were faced with how to allocate limited amounts of funds. Ultimately, spending increased on athletics, and cuts were made on the academic end (this includes Ball State)."

What cuts?







log out